**Biden Administration Cancels Controversial Climate Plan Impacting Old Growth Forests**
After more than two years of meticulous planning and intense debate, the Biden administration has decided to scrap the National Old Growth Amendment, a move that could have far-reaching impacts on the management and protection of the nation’s ancient forests in the face of climate change.
**
Uproar Over the Sudden Abandonment
**
The U.S. Forest Service’s decision to halt the amendment abruptly halts any federal-level efforts to create a cohesive strategy for safeguarding the oldest trees across the vast expanse of land under its jurisdiction. Instead, the responsibility for protecting these invaluable natural resources will now fall on local authorities, according to Randy Moore, the agency’s chief.
In a letter addressed to regional foresters and forest directors, Moore emphasized the importance of continuing to conserve these forests based on the most up-to-date scientific data available. He acknowledged the need to recognize the unique characteristics of each location to ensure the resilience and longevity of old-growth forests in the face of evolving ecological conditions.
**
Controversy and Criticism Surrounding the Plan
**
President Biden’s executive order aimed to enhance the resilience of the nation’s forests, prompting the Forest Service to seek a more consistent approach to protecting mature and old-growth trees across its vast network of forests and grasslands. However, the agency’s attempt to standardize protection measures faced significant opposition from various quarters.
While environmentalists and scientists expressed concerns about potential loopholes that could permit logging in old-growth forests, Republican legislators and industry representatives argued that logging was crucial for sustaining state economies. The ensuing debate and pushback ultimately contributed to the decision to abandon the amendment, as reported by the Associated Press.
**
Local Management and Future Conservation Efforts
**
Despite the setback, advocates like Ron Daines, a Republican senator from Montana, hailed the Forest Service’s move as a victory for commonsense forest management at the local level. The decision was seen as a validation of existing regulations that already protect old-growth forests in various regions, ensuring ongoing conservation efforts in the absence of a centralized federal plan.
Looking ahead, Will Harlan of the Center for Biological Diversity sees the demise of the plan as an opportunity to focus on protecting old-growth forests on a case-by-case basis. As conservation groups gear up to monitor and challenge logging projects that could threaten these invaluable ecosystems, the fight to preserve old-growth forests continues at the grassroots level.
In the face of evolving environmental challenges and political dynamics, the fate of the nation’s old-growth forests remains uncertain. However, the resilience and determination of those committed to their conservation offer a glimmer of hope for the future of these ancient natural wonders.